On Thursday, September 8, with just short of 20 minutes left to spare in sixth period, news of the death of England's Queen Elizabeth II reached the ASFA community. And many in the ASFA community rejoiced.
The divide in the reactions seen at ASFA was mostly generational. Why was the younger generation quick to laugh as the older immediately mourned?
Junior Creative Writer Kalvin Crescenzi said he had prayed for Elizabeth’s death for many years.
“I just think that a monarchy is a fundamentally flawed institution," he said. "Not to compliment America or anything, but I think there’s a reason we don’t have one. I just think that [she] is objectively, morally a terrible person.” Kalvin listed the Queen’s crimes against humanity as taking money from the less fortunate, colonization, and genocide.
When asked about his opinion on the student body’s joyful reaction, Kalvin said he found it hilarious. “Walking through the halls right after it happened — I’m definitely going to remember that. It was very gratifying to see because I’ve been waiting for it for so long. Better than I could ever hope for. I high-fived several people in the halls.”
Seeing warnings against online humor around the former monarch’s passing, Kalvin detailed his frustration.
“I think that it is pointless to tell people not to joke about it. The vast majority of people saying not to joke about it have never met this lady. You don’t know her, you’re not her family. You don’t need to be defending her because she’s somebody’s grandmother,” he said. “It’s pointless to defend her like you’re related to her when there’s this endless list of what she’s done and allowed to happen, and the reaction from younger generations points to a shift in the perspective of how we view monarchies and governmental institutions as a whole.”
What causes the stark difference in how the community understands the queen’s legacy? What does the queen represent to us as Americans, and how do the adults in our community understand it?
History and English teacher Mrs. Rachel Reinhart said she found the student body’s thundering reaction to be intriguing and historically significant.
“Historically, it’s nice to see the ASFA students’ reactions, because it shows that they have had a more critical eye on history," Reinhart said. "They now see the monarchy as something that has cost the world in a lot more ways than it has benefited the world. And I was surprised to see it, but I probably should not have been.
"It’s partly because of education — not just in school but also access to external media... I see teenagers seeking out critical discourse, and to me, that’s exciting.”
She goes on to explain her point of view, how different circumstances were in her youth. “At my high school, there was a real, generalized respect for the monarchy, and I think that has to do with the way we were indoctrinated through children’s princess movies. More than half the people I knew had stayed up to watch Diana marry Charles, because it was a fantasy people could see be played out in real life. Someone who had been a daycare worker could become a princess and then possibly the queen, and that appealed to people’s sense of fantasy and possibility.”
Reinhart confesses she was not surprised to see the sadness others experienced receiving the news of the Queen. This loss, she explains, of such a power structure is unsettling for some. The Queen had been ruling the United Kingdom for seventy years; she is generationally familiar. Especially with other upsetting news in recent times, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, once again losing something so greatly familiar causes a strong reaction from the public.
Reinhart commented on the Queen’s role in feminism, describing it as “a strong, dominant, shrewd female power force in the world.” For some, Queen Elizabeth II was a beacon of power not only in the monarchy and the United Kingdom, but also in representing the heights a woman can reach.
Reinhart said she was concerned about the online discourse. She talked about the danger freedom on the Internet can bring. It enables a source of discussion, giving voices to those who wouldn’t otherwise have one. However, it has also encouraged people to care less about words’ consequences, which might lead to further conflict.
The differences in how the world understands the former monarch’s death can be seen as valid across the board. Whether they celebrate, criticize, joke, or mourn, it is with a certain understanding of the British monarchy and with complete free will to respond as they please. Good or bad, the former Queen means something to all.
The British Empire was overwhelming. If you've ever wanted to know which counties, territories, protectorates, provinces, colonies, and mandates were colonized, occupied, exploited, controlled, or destabilized by Britain here they go:
Former British Colonies - Year of Independence from Britain
1 Aden Protectorate-1967
2 Anglo-Egyptian Sudan -1956
3 Auckland Islands-1931
4 Bahamas-1973
5 Bahrain - 1971
6 Bangladesh - 1971 (From Pakistan)
7 Barbados-1966
8 Basutoland (Lesotho)-1966
9 Bechuanaland (Botswana)-1966
10 Bermuda-1995
11 British Borneo (Brunei)-1984
12 British Cameroon-1961
13 British East Africa (Kenya)-1963
14 British East Africa (Uganda)-1962
15 British Egypt-1922
16 British Guiana-1966
17 British Honduras (Belize) -1981
18 British India-1947
19 British Malaya (Malaysia)-1957
20 British Solomon Islands-1978
21 British Somaliland (Somalia)-1960
22 British Togoland -1957
23…
Hello! I do not keep up to date on world events and was confused the day the queen died. Everybody had mixed reactions, like you said, and I wasn't sure what to think of any of them! Would you guys consider expanding on the article to go more in depth about good and bad things the queen did? People like me are still trying to figure things out and form opinions for themselves! I could just go online, true, but it would be hard to find articles criticizing the queen for me to see both sides of the story, especially after her death!